Portfolio
No. 73Statistical learning, modeling, and epidemiology
NameRobert M. Sholl
SubjectMixed models, nonlinear systems, and small samples
BegunAugust 2020
If found, please return to Dickens 009C
Ruled left, grid right. Pencil or pen.
Common distributions
| Distribution | Kernel | Mean | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | |||
| Student t | |||
| Chi-squared | |||
| Exponential | |||
| Gamma | |||
| Beta | |||
| Uniform | |||
| Binomial | |||
| Poisson |
The Heilmeier catechism
Contents
- Change of support page 1
- Expert elicitation page 3
- Partial differential equations page 5
- Network models page 7
- N-mixture models page 9
- Outbreak forecasting page 11
- Bayesian risk analysis page 13
- Agent-based models page 15
- Apps you can try page 17
- Papers, posters, talks page 19
- Teaching, service, CV page 21
- Get in touch page 23
I build statistical and mathematical models, primarily for public health, safety, and agricultural problems. I also consult and specialize in small, data-scarce experiments as well as longitudinal forecasting.
I initially trained in microbiology, food-safety, and clinical lab settings so I like knowing where data comes from and seeing the data generating process.
Subject Change of support When 2025 – now
Developing models for outcome-based water conservation
Kansas pays landowners to adopt practices for reducing and controlling nonpoint source pollution in water resources. I’m developing methods for applying GLMMs to join state databases so the Kansas Department of Agriculture can fund practices where each dollar has the highest impact.
The attached poster was our proof of concept and led to the GLMM route.
Want more information?: Developing models for outcome-based water conservationPoster (PDF): Developing models for outcome-based water conservation
Findings
- The CSIMS cost-share database, 2004 to 2025, queried and tabled for the first time.
- Predicts the outcome of best management practices in each HUC-12 at any time point.
- Second runner-up in the graduate poster competition, 2025 Governor’s Water Conference.
Subject Expert elicitation When 2025 – now
Expert elicitation as a form of dimension reduction
Two decades of Kansas Department of Agriculture records hold 108 names for conservation practices, many of them duplicates. We turn experts’ groupings and exclusions into data inside a frequentist measurement-error model, so an expert counts as useful when their opinion narrows the confidence bands on practice effects.
Want more information?: Expert elicitation as a form of dimension reductionPoster (PDF): Expert elicitation as a form of dimension reductionLele and Allen (2006): Expert elicitation as a form of dimension reduction
Findings
- The academic expert’s groupings gave a confidence band 1.5% as wide as the data alone (ratio 0.015).
- All experts were informative, any grouping leads to less variance, but some experts are better than others.
- One expert beat both principal components (0.421) and the lasso (0.667) at variable selection.
Subject Partial differential equations When 2024 – now
Mother-to-offspring spread in prion disease forecasts
Chronic wasting disease forecasts such as the diffusion model of Hefley et al. (2017) work only for the species they were built for, yet prions behave the same in every species. I propose adding mother-to-offspring transfer, to test whether that pathway matters and whether separating pathways lets one model forecast beyond deer.
Want more information?: Mother-to-offspring spread in prion disease forecastsPoster (PDF): Mother-to-offspring spread in prion disease forecastsHefley et al. (2017): Mother-to-offspring spread in prion disease forecasts
Findings
- Adds a birth indicator to the Hefley et al. model; Bayesian variable selection keeps or drops it.
- To be checked against the original model and a generalized additive model of incidence.
- Built in R for Wisconsin DNR surveillance data, with forecasts mapped in GIS for managers.
Subject Network models When Personal project
Rabies in raccoon contact networks
How do infection and removal rates shape a rabies outbreak? I simulated stochastic SIR epidemics on a real 23-raccoon proximity network and on its 113-node rescaled twin, with the event-driven simulator, the network metrics and the epidemic threshold all written from scratch in base R.
Findings
- Outbreak size depends on the ratio of infection to removal rate alone, on both networks.
- So raising removal works as well as cutting transmission, which supports removing and vaccinating.
- Epidemic thresholds of 0.187 (observed) and 0.151 (rescaled), from each network’s largest eigenvalue.
Subject N-mixture models When Project on-hold
Forecasting state overdose deaths through the surge
Could state data from 2014 to 2018 have forecast overdose deaths in every state from 2019 to 2022? I compared lasso-selected quasi-Poisson GLMs, spline GAMs and hierarchical negative-binomial models fitted with a sampler I wrote by hand, all scored on the four held-out years.
Findings
- A quasi-Poisson GLM with state effects forecast best: RMSE 508 deaths, median error 13%.
- The hierarchical Bayesian model came within 3% (RMSE 521) with the best coverage, 77% of 90% intervals.
- Giving each state its own trend overfit (RMSE 959), and no model foresaw the fentanyl surge.
Subject Outbreak forecasting When Project on-hold
What makes a norovirus outbreak at sea large?
Using 63 norovirus outbreaks reported to the CDC Vessel Sanitation Program from 2014 to 2019, I modelled the share of people aboard who fell ill with beta-binomial regression, compared ship size, voyage length, season and departure region, and checked every model with leave-one-out cross-validation.
Findings
- Attack rates cluster around 4% at any ship size: odds ratio 1.03 per doubling of people aboard.
- The full model had the best AIC but the worst cross-validated score; its effects rest on two outbreaks.
- Outbreaks are more frequent from December to April, but no larger.
Subject Bayesian risk analysis When Consulting
Buying a home in Manhattan, Kansas, priced for risk
Due diligence on six inspected houses in Manhattan, Kansas: what the inspections will cost, how likely buying is to beat renting, what an early move could cost, and how each would do as a rental. The forecasts come from a Bayesian model of local prices.
The prior on the long-run growth μ comes from inflation.
Detailed write-up : Buying a home in Manhattan, Kansas, priced for risk
Findings
- Four of the six need $38,000 to $48,000 of repairs, mostly roofs and foundations.
- Only Houses C and D are worth offers, near $206,000 and $193,000.
- Each house has a 5% chance of being underwater in year three.
Subject Agent-based models When Consulting
Frederick County housing, built buyer by buyer
An agent-based model of the housing market in Frederick County, Maryland. Owners, renters, investor firms and flippers each follow a few plain rules, and prices, rents and sales emerge from their trades. Switching rules off one at a time shows what drives the market.
S is months of supply; six is a balanced market.
Detailed write-up : Frederick County housing, built buyer by buyer
Findings
- When rates jump from 3% to 7%, sales fall 17% while prices hold. Without rate lock-in, sales would rise.
- Owners who won’t sell below what they paid keep prices up, and many rent their homes out instead.
- To 2030, prices rise about 28% whatever rates do, while sales drift 15 to 18% lower as affordability tightens.
Apps you can try
Small apps for students and clients to try a model rather than read about it.
Pick one to try:
- Bootstrap Lab Watch a slope’s sampling distribution build up, one resample at a time.
- Regression Model Builder Build a regression, check its residuals and score it on held-out rows.
- Field Data Explorer Compare groups, marginal means and principal components in field data.
Earlier Shiny apps
Papers and posters
- Horn, C. , Sholl, R. M. , Haskell, D. , Hebbar, S. and Zinovyeva, A. (2020). Two new CRISPR-generated alleles in the C. elegans mir-1022 gene. microPublication Biology.
Posters
- Sholl, R. M. and Hefley, T. J. (2026). Mining the mind: expert elicitation as a form of dimension reduction. Governor’s Conference on the Future of Water in Kansas.
- Sholl, R. M. and Hefley, T. J. (2025). Spatio-temporal models for optimizing water conservation practices. Governor’s Conference on the Future of Water in Kansas. Second runner-up, graduate poster competition.
- Sholl, R. M. and Hefley, T. J. (2024). Forecasting disaster: adding a human touch to animal disease predictions. Research and the State, Kansas State University.
Workshops
- Solving problems with data
- Presenting ideas as a data scientist
Teaching
-
Biometrics II STAT 341
Applied regression for biological problems.
-
Biometrics I STAT 240
Introductory statistics for the biological sciences, taught two semesters running.
-
Introduction to Statistics STAT 225
Built the coursework and lectured on sampling, probability, set theory, regression and distributions.
Service
- Guest lectures, STAT 705 Regression and ANOVA
- Consulting for K-State graduate researchers
- Linux From Scratch docs and testing, 2021–23
Education
- PhD, StatisticsKansas State University
- expected 2028
- MS, Statistics & Data ScienceKansas State University
- 2026
- BS, MicrobiologyKansas State University
- 2021
Positions
- Statistical consultantIndependent
- 2024 – now
- Graduate research fellowKansas Water Institute
- 2025 – now
Awards
- Second runner-up, graduate poster competitionGovernor’s Water Conference, Kansas, 2025
- Lolafaye Coyne Summer Research ScholarshipKansas State University, three summers, 2026
Get in touch
I’m always interested in hearing about collaborations in the biological or agricultural sciences. I’m also happy to discuss my services as a consultant in statistical or mathematical modeling, invitations to speak, guest lecture, or run a workshop.
Good reasons to write
- Development of a statistical or mathematical model
- Consulting on small or data-scarce studies
- A workshop on modeling, statistical methods, data science, or scientific communication
- Any problem in forecasting, statistical learning, or AI. I promise, I’m interested!
Elsewhere
Next
- query and table the CSIMS records (done)
- connect CSIMS with ambient quality data (done)
- test GLMM generation (done)
- rerun expert interviews
- find more consulting projects
Conversions
| 1 ft³/s | 0.02832 m³/s |
| 1 acre-foot | 1,233.5 m³ |
| 1 mg/L in water | 1 ppm |
| 1 mi² | 2.590 km² |
| 1 hectare | 2.471 acres |
| 1 lb/acre | 1.121 kg/ha |
| 1 lb | 0.4536 kg |
Portfolio No. 73 Robert M. Sholl, Department of Statistics, Kansas State University